Our Round Robin blog for Saturday, February 15th, is on the topic of Romance. If you write romance, what do you like (or dislike) about the genre and all other genres? Do you include romance in your stories?
I have always enjoyed reading romance novels, from my first
Georgette Heyer Regency romance when I was thirteen to the latest contemporary romance. They were and are pure escapism, which is why I write romance.
Over the years, many people I have met who have learned I am
an author have told me they could write a romance as “It’s only a basic formula,
after all.” And as one close friend, who should have known better, once said, “Two
people meet, fall in love, get married, have two children and a dog. The end.”
She had completely ignored the times she had seen or heard
me almost pulling my hair out while trying to determine the nuances of building
my characters to make them unique and plausible or deciding what
subplot would best create confusion and conflict in their burgeoning relationship.
Romance Writers of America defines romance as ‘two basic
elements comprise every romance novel: a central love story and an emotionally
satisfying and optimistic ending.’
As with any genre, subplots and conflict are necessary parts of the storytelling process if you want to
keep your reader engaged, but in a romance novel, the love story must be the main focus. Romance novels swing through a whole arc from sweet to super hot and in many subgenres, from historical and contemporary to fantasy, young adult, and paranormal, and at each end of the scale, spiritual to sexy. Whatever the heat level, our romantic couple must risk everything for each other before they get their happy-ever-after or happy-for-now ending.I enjoy writing romance, especially historical romance,
because I love putting my very proper heroines into unexpected and sometimes
dangerous situations. They are not simpering sampler stitchers but real live
flesh and blood, up and at ‘em in-your-face type gals. As I have often been
told, my heroines are far too out of the box for a traditional Regency romance,
but those are the kinds of characters I like, so that’s what I write and make
no apologies for. The fact that my research into the historical facts for the
Regency years (strictly 1811 – 1820) is in-depth and solid enough to create my
settings and clothe my characters realistically is rarely, if ever, commented on.
My heroes, the guys who often raise their eyebrows at the shenanigans my gals become embroiled in,
![]() |
Vincent Cassel |
Novels set before 1950 are considered historical, and my
historical romances have covered the years 1814 to 1818 (Regency) 1907 to 1918
(Edwardian) and 1935, this last being Book #1 in BWL Publishing Inc’s Canadian
Historical Brides Collection.
I am currently working on a cozy mystery series, but I have no doubt that I will eventually return to where it all began, particularly as another writer friend challenged me to write a Scottish Regency romance. Hmm. That might mean a return trip to Edinburgh!
Thanks to Skye Taylor for this month's topic, and welcome to our new bloggers, Belinda Edwards and Sally Odgers.
Bob Rich https://wp.me/p3Xihq-3pV
A.J. Maguire http://ajmaguire.wordpress.
Belinda Edwards https://booksbybelinda.com/
Helena Fairfax http://www.helenafairfax.com/
Connie Vines http://mizging.blogspot.com/
Diane Bator https://escapewithawriter.
Sally Odgers https://behindsallysbooks.
Skye Taylor http://www.skye-writer.com/